Zynga IPO prices hit top of the range

Online games producer Zynga late on Thursday managed to raise $1bn in its initial public offering after it priced shares at the top end of a preliminary $8.50 to $10 market range.

The creator of games including “FarmVille” and “CityVille” sold 100 million shares of Class A common stock at $10 a share in the IPO. The initial share price gives the group a valuation of an estimated $7bn.

Zynga’s offering is the largest by a US internet company since Google’s IPO raised $1.9bn in 2004, Bloomberg data showed.

Brazil sues Chevron for $10.6bn oil spill damage

Brazilian federal prosecutors late on Wednesday sued US-based Chevron and rig operator Transocean for $10.6bn in damages following environmental harm alleged to have been caused by an oil leakage in early November.

Prosecutors also asked the court to force the companies to shut down operations at the Frade field in Brazil until the case is resolved. The Frade field site, where the spill occurred, is Chevron’s biggest capital investment.

“During an investigation, the attorney general’s office found that Chevron and Transocean were not capable of controlling the damage from a spill of 3,000 barrels of oil, proving a lack of environmental planning and management,” a prosecutors’ statement said.

Olympus meets earnings deadline to stay in TSE

Japanese optical equipment manufacturer Olympus has submitted long delayed earnings reports on Wednesday, only hours before a crucial deadline to avoid being removed from the Tokyo Stock Exchange.

The TSE, the world’s second largest bourse, has now removed the company from its watch list for automatic ejection. However, Olympus continues to be at risk of being delisted pending results of an investigation into the group’s accounting practices.

The camera maker reported net assets of ¥46bn as of the end of September, according to its surrendered financial report for the second quarter.

Banking at the crossroads

The global banking sector is at a crossroads, following the unprecedented turmoil of the past four years. As it seeks to reinvent itself, the sector faces several critical inflection points that will affect the future creditworthiness of banks. It is too early to tell how each one will play out but we believe that our new banking criteria provides a coherent, globally consistent framework to assess how these developments are likely to affect the creditworthiness of banks.

The first major inflection point currently facing the banking sector is a potential shift in the power balance of global banking between banks in the developed markets of Western Europe and the US on one side, and the larger emerging countries in Asia and Latin America on the other. The developed banking markets in the US and Western Europe are under pressure and a recovery is still not assured. At the same time, banking systems in Latin America, Emerging Europe and Asia-Pacific are growing but, in our view, remain constrained by relatively weak financial infrastructure, institutional and legal frameworks, underwriting standards, payment cultures and rules of law.

The second inflection point is the continuing regulatory uncertainty facing banks. While many attempts at regulation on a global basis have been tried, devising a universal system promises to be a thorny and potentially elusive quest. The prospect of unintended consequences is high, the impact of which will take years to manifest. This developing regulatory backdrop may set the scene for a decline in revenues for traditional regulated banking and a growth in volumes for shadow banking and disintermediation.

The third inflection point is the potential consequence of a change in the nature of government support for banks. The intervention of governments and central banks around the world has succeeded in creating an interim period of stabilisation for many of the Western European and the US banking systems. But, as the events of the last few months have shown, it is a fragile peace.

We believe that governments are looking for ways to reduce their contingent risk to the banking sector, but not at the expense of undermining the financial system. The recent bailout of Dexia, alongside the extension of new liquidity measures and the expected €108bn capital raising for eurozone banks, demonstrates the economic realities that governments face and the real support they need to provide despite any longer term political will to reduce it. Consequently, we expect many governments will continue supporting banks until they are strong enough to stand without support. For some this could take years, if ever.

Our new bank criteria aim to provide greater transparency and consistency to reflect this evolving market. It is a refinement of our analysis rather than a reinvention. It builds on what we knew before the financial crisis and incorporates what we have learned about how banks, investors and governments respond. It is the result of extensive market consultation, during which we met with over 2,500 interested parties and spoke with more than 10,000 users of ratings.

We have heard the market feedback about increased transparency loudly and clearly. Therefore, we are explaining very clearly the ‘building blocks’ of our ratings for investors and other market participants, who can then agree or disagree with our assumptions when doing their own analysis.

To borrow an analogy from the insurance market, a person’s home address can impact their house or car insurance premiums. In the same way, our new criteria are placing a greater emphasis on the country in which a bank operates, through an enhanced version of our existing banking industry country risk assessment (BICRA) methodology.

By doing this, we will give more weight to the risks associated with growing economic imbalances, the resilience of the economy, and the importance of system-wide funding and the role of governments and central banks in this funding. This analysis will be a consistent starting point for our rating. It creates a framework to evaluate the relative strengths of banking systems and to recognise how these trends affect our bank ratings.

This starting point is then adjusted up or down the rating scale to reflect our assessment of a bank’s specific strengths and weaknesses in business position, capital and earnings, risk position, and funding and liquidity. After this, we assess the potential for government support and/or group support (for example, a parent company to a subsidiary). Following final analytical adjustments and a vote by a rating committee, this then leads to the issuer credit rating.

Our new criteria will allow us to clearly separate the stand-alone credit profile and the impact of government support in our ratings. This means that a change in the likelihood of future government support for banks will be clearly identified and articulated.

The new criteria introduce clear guidance on how our own measure of bank capital, the risk-adjusted capital (RAC) ratio, influences our ratings. Despite significant deleveraging in the US and Western Europe over the past two years, we believe capital is at most neutral to a slight weakness for the ratings. In Asia and Latin America, we see rapid growth that has prevented any meaningful build up of capital.

At the same time, bank funding and liquidity has strengthened since 2007, but it is too early to tell whether this represents a structural improvement. Our new criteria recognize that some banks are more sensitive to shifts in confidence than others based primarily on their dependence on short-term wholesale funding.

In conclusion, regardless of governments’ recent and emerging policy responses, the historic pattern of banking sector boom and bust and government support will likely repeat itself in some fashion. New laws put in place following previous crises, such as deposit insurance, have not prevented subsequent downturns. Banking crises will likely happen again.

The outlook for the global banking industry is clouded by the potential shift in the balance of power among banks, the emergence of a more significant shadow banking sector, and the potential for a different relationship between banks and governments. Our revised criteria will enable us to provide opinions that reflect the impact of these major systemic changes on the banking sector.

Areva shelves projects and plans 1,500 job cuts amid $1.6bn loss

Areva, the globe’s largest supplier of nuclear fuel and services, on Tuesday said it is to suspend building work at sites including Africa, the US and France.

The news comes a day after it announced it is expecting to post an operating loss of between $1.4 and $1.6bn this year.

The French company also unveiled plans of limiting its dividend payout to 25 percent of net profits for the next 24 months, according to CEO, Luc Oursel.

Areva will slash up to 1,500 jobs in Germany and has suspended a nuclear plant project in the US to help offset losses, Oursel unveiled in a statement.

Money on the table for technology firms

The current financial and economic crisis, which a large part of the world is still enduring, has resulted in something of a rethink regarding the road ahead for many businesses, not to mention banks and venture capitalists. Quite a number of them seem to have come to the conclusion that the secret to economic recovery does not lie in mega-corporations, but in smaller companies that can adjust to changes in the business environment more rapidly, particularly technology companies. It is too early to predict another dot com boom, but there is suddenly a great deal of interest in internet-based businesses once more.

Venture capitalists are well aware that it is only a matter of time before the next big technology firm springs up in a small, nondescript building somewhere and that it might well be called Zoosk, Chegg or Xactly.

The Wall Street Journal recently published their list of the top 50 venture-capital backed companies and there are quite a number of technology firms on the list.

Xactly Corp develops web-based software; Zoosk Inc. develops social services sites and Chegg Inc develops e-commerce sites; they all feature prominently on the Wall Street Journal top 50 list.

To qualify for a place on the list, a company must have received financial backing during the last three years and it has to be valued at less than $1bn, which of course disqualifies giants such as Groupon, Twitter and Google.

Many of these companies are in the well-established IT category, a favourite of venture capitalists for a long time. Xirrus Inc, a company that manufactures Wi-Fi technology devices, takes the number two spot. Its founder, Dirk Gates, is also the former owner of another high-technology start-up, Xircom, which he sold to Intel Corporation.

Xactly, another software development company, takes the number three position on the WSJ list. Xactly develops sales compensation software and its future prospects looked so bright that it managed to obtain financial backing from giants such as Salesforce.com, Oracle and Microsoft Corporation.

The renewed popularity of internet start-ups amongst technology firms can be seen from the large number of these companies on the WSJ list. At number eight, we find Glam Media, which publishes lifestyle websites. Etsy Inc takes the number 12 position with their online craft market. At number 29 is an online dating site, Zoosk, and the number 31 position is taken by Chegg, a company that provides textbook-rental services.

A number of companies on last year’s list managed to gain sufficient financial backing from investors to make this year’s list again. For example at number 26, we find Jive Software Inc. They received backing from Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, the same people who invested in Twitter and Facebook.

Suniva Incorporated, a company that produces solar cells, is on the list again this year, although it dropped from the number 15 spot to 38. Another technology company, Silver Peak Systems Inc, is in 44th position this year, after appearing at number 20 on last year’s list.

Equity deals drought to cost banker jobs

A handful of bumper deals in the first half of 2011, such as the $10bn flotation of commodities firm Glencore and a $13bn fundraising by Commerzbank, has helped cushion the impact of a slow second half for many but with just $17.6bn raised in Europe since the end of July, banks are having to make a call on when things might pick up.

Annualised, the volumes seen between August and November would make for the lowest European equity fundraising levels for more than 10 years, according to Thomson Reuters data.

“I expect to see a substantial culling of the herd. Banks will leave and even for the banks that remain there will be some level of head count shrinkage,” said one senior banker working in equity capital markets (ECM), which includes activity such as stock market listings, rights issues and secondary share sales.

“All banks are having to reevaluate their business models and figure out what they can and can’t be committed to … We are at a point in the bank profitability cycle where you have to ask yourself if there is not a demonstrable value proposition, how can all this headcount and cost continue to be justified?”

Investment banks such as Barclays, Credit Suisse and the European arms of their US peers have invested heavily in equity business as a whole, banking on a pick-up in the market that was then scuppered by economic woes.

Some banks are already scaling back in equities – Italy’s UniCredit ditched its equities sales and trading team in Western Europe in favour of a tie-up with French brokerage Kepler Capital Markets, effectively outsourcing the business –while others are reassessing the importance of Europe.

“A lot of banks are asking themselves whether Europe is really going to be a region in which they want to engage,” said one London-based banker.

Last month the chief financial officer of Japan’s Nomura said 60 percent of a planned $1.2bn cost savings would come from Europe, where it is losing money and has 4,500 workers, or about 13 percent of its total staff.

Little by little
Europe is seen as the most fiercely competitive region for ECM business, with the largest number of players chasing the smallest number of deals.

At least ten banks want to be among the top five, bankers say, and aggressive pitching for deals is pushing fees down to what some consider to be unsustainable levels.

Goldman Sachs is at the top of the European ECM league tables for 2011, followed by Deutsche Bank in second and Morgan Stanley in third place.

Those committed to maintaining their position in both Europe and ECM will have to strike the right balance between short-term cuts and the ability to jump on any uptick in activity.

“You need to keep a certain infrastructure in place because the market can bounce back and if you cut back too far then you’ll miss out on all the opportunities because hiring takes a long time in this industry,” said a second senior ECM banker.

Unlike their equities trading colleagues, ECM teams have not yet been heavily affected by job cuts, but they have little doubt the overall number of people working in the sector will shrink, with a wave of cuts likely mid-year if continued market uncertainty keeps the first half quiet.

“If you could get a real read on numbers of ECM people in Europe, my guess is that by January 2013 you are going to be 25-30 percent down on January this year,” said one ECM banker. Several others agreed 25 percent was a realistic number.

“It is going to be very different on a bank by bank basis. Some banks will be 5-10 percent down, and some will be 50-60 percent down,” he added.

While most think banks will do their best to scale back rather than mothball whole departments, for some the exit of smaller players is inevitable.

“We are going to see a winnowing out of competition, starting with the non-bulge bracket banks,” said the second senior ECM banker, referring to banks lower down the league tables.

“The second and third tier players are probably going to be withdrawing little by little. Even parts of the bulge bracket will be struggling to stay in there.”

German president criticises G20’s crisis approach

German President Christian Wulff criticised efforts by the Group of 20 nations to contain the global financial crisis, saying they were too small in scale and had achieved little.

Last month’s summit of G20 leaders in France failed to bring progress which the world urgently needed, Wulff said, citing regulation of the financial sector and setting stricter guidelines for the operations of major banks as examples of the group’s failures.

“The approaches that have been tried so far are too modest to match the scale of the problems that the crisis has exposed,” Wulff said in a speech to businessmen on Monday during a visit to Abu Dhabi, capital of the UAE.

Accompanied by a political and business delegation, Wulff is visiting the UAE as part of a tour to several Gulf states. He has a largely ceremonial role and little direct influence on government policy, but has spoken out this year as the eurozone debt crisis has worsened; in August he questioned the legality of the ECB’s bond-buying programme.

Excessive debt, economic imbalances and competitive weaknesses in a number of countries have eroded trust in global financial markets, Wulff said on Monday, adding that the problem was not limited to Europe.

“In the context of the G20 and of global responsibility too, I appeal to everyone to start paying far more attention to sound, sustainable economic development and finances.”

Wulff said that as Europe worked to repair its economy, Berlin would count on the oil-rich UAE as a major investor in Germany. But he did not make any public appeal for the UAE or other Gulf countries to contribute emergency aid to Europe.

EU leaders agreed at a summit in Brussels on Friday that eurozone states and other nations should provide up to €200bn ($270bn) in bilateral loans to the IMF to help it tackle the zone’s debt crisis. They envisaged €50bn of the total coming from non-euro countries, but it is not clear which nations would be willing to provide the money.

Eurozone moves with fiscal union, UK stands its ground

Europe divided on Friday in a historic rift over building a fiscal union to preserve the euro, with a large majority of countries led by Germany and France agreeing to move ahead with a separate treaty, leaving Britain isolated.

 

Twenty-three of the 27 leaders agreed to pursue tighter integration with stricter budget rules for the single currency area, but Britain said it could not accept proposed amendments to the EU treaty after failing to secure concessions for itself.

After 10 hours of talks, all 17 members of the eurozone and six countries that aspire to join resolved to negotiate a new agreement alongside the EU treaty with a tougher deficit and debt regime to insulate the eurozone against the debt crisis.

 

“Not Europe, Brits divided. And they are outside of decision making. Europe is united,” Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite said in blunt English on arriving for the second day of the bloc’s eighth crisis summit this year.

 

ECB President Mario Draghi called the decision a step forward for the stricter budget rules he has said are necessary if the 17-nation eurozone is to emerge stronger from two years of market turmoil.

 

“It’s going to be the basis for a good fiscal compact and more discipline in economic policy in the euro area members,” Draghi said. “We came to conclusions that will have to be fleshed out more in the coming days.”

 

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said she was very satisfied with the decisions. The world would see that Europe had learned from its mistakes and avoided “lousy compromise”, she said.

 

 

Merkel, Europe’s most powerful leader, said she had not given up hope that Britain would eventually agree to change the EU treaty to anchor stricter budget discipline.

 

Active ECB support will be vital in the coming days.

 

Irish Europe Minister Lucinda Creighton said Dublin and many other member states expect the central bank to take a more pro-active approach to the debt crisis in the weeks ahead.

 

Traders said the ECB bought Italian bonds on Friday to steady markets.

 

The euro, shares and commodities fell in Asia because of growing doubts about whether Europe can forge a convincing financial firewall to arrest contagion in bond markets, but the currency regained ground in Europe and European stocks were narrowly higher.

 

“Markets need to know where we are going, how we’re getting there, and they need to know how long it’s going to take. Where we are going, I believe, is toward a more unified and serious Europe in budgetary terms,” said Francois Perol, chief executive of BPCE, France’s second largest bank.

 

Asked if the euro was safe now, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said: “I’m not sure.”

 

In the run-up to the summit, Draghi’s use of the term “fiscal compact” had spurred hopes that the ECB would be prepared to engage in massive buying of bonds from distressed eurozone states, an interpretation he discouraged on Thursday.

 

German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy had wanted to get the whole EU to agree to change the Lisbon treaty so that stricter budget and debt rules for eurozone states could be enshrined in the bloc’s basic law.

 

But Britain, which is outside the eurozone, refused to back the move, saying it wanted guarantees in a protocol protecting its financial services industry. Sarkozy described British Prime Minister David Cameron’s demand as unacceptable.

 

Cameron hinted London may try to prevent the others from using the executive European Commission and the European Court of Justice, saying: “Clearly the institutions of the European Union belong to the European Union, they belong to the 27.”

 

Historic summit
As a result, Sarkozy and Merkel said the intention was now to forge an intergovernmental treaty among the eurozone countries and any others that wanted to join. They indicated that could be up to 25 countries in all, with only Britain and perhaps Hungary left outside the tent for now. Sweden and the Czech Republic said they would consult their parliaments.

 

“This is a summit that will go down in history,” said Sarkozy. “We would have preferred a reform of the treaties among 27. That wasn’t possible given the position of our British friends. And so it will be through an intergovernmental treaty of 17, but open to others.”

 

Herman Van Rompuy, the president of the European Council and the summit chairman, focused on the success in securing agreement for tighter fiscal limits, including the need for countries to bring budgets close to balance.

 

“It means reinforcing our rules on excessive deficit procedures by making them more automatic. It also means that member states would have to submit their draft budgetary plans to the (European) Commission,” he said.

 

On treaty change, Van Rompuy said the new treaty would involve the eurozone and at least six other countries, with two more waiting for a mandate to participate.

 

“An inter-governmental treaty can be approved and ratified much more rapidly than a full-fledged treaty change, and I think speed is also very important to enhance credibility,” he said.

 

But it could still take months of wrangling, with countries like Finland and Slovakia opposing a Franco-German drive to take decisions on future bailouts by a supermajority to avoid being taken hostage by a single small country.

 

Last chance saloon?
In a meeting billed as a last chance to save the euro, with financial markets unconvinced by policymakers’ efforts to tackle the region’s problems so far, the leaders also took several critical decisions on the permanent bailout fund, the European Stability Mechanism, which will come into force in July 2012.

 

The ESM’s capacity will be capped at 500 billion euros ($666 billion), less than had been suggested was possible before the  summit, and the facility will not get a banking licence, as Van Rompuy originally had proposed, due to German opposition.

 

It also was agreed that EU countries would provide up to 200 billion euros in bilateral loans to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to help it tackle the crisis, with 150 billion euros of the total coming from the euro zone countries.

 

“We can be very pleased at the result,” IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde said as she left the summit.

 

Cameron’s decision to stay out of the treaty-change camp could spell problems for Britain, although it was expected to find favour with the increasingly vocal eurosceptic wing of his Conservative party initially.

 

The danger is that if a large majority of EU countries do push ahead with deeper integration, it could involve changes to the single market and financial regulation, both of which could have a profound impact on the British economy.

 

“Cameron was clumsy in his manoeuvring,” a senior EU diplomat said. It may be possible that Britain will shift its position in the days ahead if it discovers that isolation really is not a viable course of action, diplomats said.

 

At the same time, if Britain does stay out, not only could it mark an irrevocable split with the European Union, which it joined nearly 40 years ago, but it will leave the rest of the EU and euro zone to institutionalise a ‘two-speed’ Europe.

 

Earlier, the plight of Europe’s banks was thrown into sharp relief. The European Banking Authority told them to increase their capital by a total of 114.7 billion euros, significantly more than predicted two months ago.

 

A Reuters poll of economists found that while 33 out of 57 believe the euro zone will probably survive in its current form, 38 of those questioned expected this week’s summit would fail to deliver a decisive solution to the debt crisis.

Murdoch gagged

And the one that won’t happen, at least for a while, is Murdoch-controlled News International’s minimum £12bn ($18.76bn) bid for complete control of UK-based satellite channel group BSkyB. The bid was withdrawn following general outrage after some of Murdoch’s British journalists hacked into the phones of celebrities and politicians.