Wealth Management Awards 2023

A report by PwC has suggested that “by 2027, 16 percent of existing asset and wealth management (AWM) organisations will have been swallowed up or have fallen by the wayside – twice the historical rate of turnover.” These sweeping changes occurring across the industry landscape means that only the most talented, adaptable and resilient wealth managers will be able to see a path through this difficult terrain and World Finance has once again recognised their considerable achievements in the Wealth Management awards.

Argentina
Santander Wealth Management & Insurance

Armenia
Unibank Prive

Australia
Nab Wealth Management

Austria
Erste Private Banking

Bahamas
Scotia Wealth Management

Bahrain
Ahli United Bank

Belgium
BNP Paribas Fortis

Bermuda
Butterfield Bank

Brazil
BTG Pactual

Bulgaria
Compass Invest

Canada
Scotia Wealth Management

Chile
BTG Pactual

China
Credit Ease Wealth Management

Colombia
BTG Pactual

Denmark
Nordea Asset & Wealth Management

Estonia
Raison Asset Management

Finland
OP Private

France
BNP Paribas Banque Privée

Georgia
TBC Wealth Management

Germany
Commerzbank Wealth Management

Greece
Hellenic Asset Management

Hong Kong
CMBI

Hungary
OPT Private Banking

Iceland
Islandsbanki Asset Management

India
Sanctum Wealth

Indonesia
Bank of Singapore

Italy
BNL BNP Paribas

Japan
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Asset Management

Kuwait
NBK Capital

Liechtenstein
Kaiser Partner (Best Multi-Client Family Office)

Lithuania
INVL

Luxembourg
Indosuez Wealth Management

Malaysia
Maybank Private Wealth

Mauritius
MCB Private Wealth Management

Mexico
Santander Wealth Management & Insurance

Monaco
CFM Indosuez Wealth Management

Netherlands
Van Lanschot Kempen

Nigeria
CardinStone

Norway
Nordea Asset & Wealth Management

Oman
Bank Muscat

Philippines
China Bank

Poland
CITI Handlowy

Portugal
Santander Wealth Management & Insurance

Qatar
Commercial Bank

Saudi Arabia
SABB

Singapore
CMBI

South Africa
Investec Wealth and Investment

South Korea
Hana Financial Group

Spain
Santander Wealth Management & Insurance

Sweden
Carnegie Private Banking

Switzerland
Piguet Galland & Cie

Taiwan
CTBC Bank

Thailand
Phatra Securities

Turkey
QNB Finans Asset Management

United Arab Emirates
Intellistocks

United Kingdom
Schroders

United States
Northern Trust

Vietnam
Genesis Fund Management

Innovation Awards 2023

The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development has reported that the value of frontier technologies, such as IoT, AI and electric vehicles, is expected to accelerate over the next decade. It is essential that we are prepared to take advantage of this by implementing robust R&D, ICT deployment, industry activity and access to finance. World Finance celebrates those who are leading this charge and, in many cases, already following through on innovations and harnessing frontier technologies.

AgTech
ProducePay

Apparel
True Fit Corporation

Biotechnology
Kaffee Bueno

Carbon Offset
DevvStream

Coffee Processing
NuZee

DeFi Technology
Valour

Digital Asset Industry
CoinFund & CoinDesk Indices

Digital Technology
DOST Digital Innovations Center

Energy
Saudi Aramco

ESG Service
e-Mission

Event Management
MCH Group

Finance and Microfinance
MNT – Halan

Financial Services
Dubai International Financial Center

Food Technology
SuperGround

Furniture Design
MillerKnoll

Glass
BA Glass

Hospitality
Red Sea Global

Hydrogen Technology
Kyoto Fusioneering

InsurTech
Pinpoint Predictive

Investment
KBC Asset Management

Logistics Services
InPost

Logistics Technology
Arrive Logistics

Medical Equipment and Devices
Volpara Health Tech

Packaging
Clearly Clean Products

Pension and Retirement
Common Wealth

Railway
Nevomo

Storage of Energy
Energy Vault

Transportation
Fleet Advantage

Wastewater Management
ZwitterCo

Digital Banking Awards 2023

The digital transformation that banks have undergone in recent years has meant a significant re-imagining of customer engagement. A recent report by PwC said “it is crucial for banks to stay ahead of the competition and improve customer experience by prioritising digital transformation,” and it is this that has dominated banking activity and the headlines in recent times. The winners of the World Finance Digital Banking awards are those paying close attention to their customer base by embracing innovative new technologies and building their cloud capabilities.

 

Best Consumer Digital Bank

Andorra
MoraBanc

Australia
Bank of Queensland

Bulgaria
Postbank

Costa Rica
BAC Credomatic

Dominican Republic
Banco Popular Dominicano

France
Revolut

Ghana
Access Bank

Greece
Alpha Bank Greece

Honduras
BAC Credomatic

Hong Kong
Standard Chartered

Indonesia
PT Bank CIMB Niaga

Kuwait
Kuwait International Bank

Mexico
Banorte

Nigeria
Access Bank PLC

Pakistan
HBL Bank

Panama
BAC Credomatic

Saudi Arabia
Al-Rahji Bank

Singapore
Standard Chartered

Turkey
Garanti BBVA

United Kingdom
Monzo

 

Best Mobile Banking App

Andorra
MoraBanc App

Australia
MyBOQ

Bulgaria
m-Postbank

Costa Rica
Banca Movil BAC

Dominican Republic
Banco Popular Dominicano

France
Revolut App

Ghana
Access Mobile App

Greece
myAlpha Vibe

Honduras
Banca Movil BAC

Hong Kong
SC Mobile Banking

Indonesia
OPCTO Mobile

Kuwait
KIB Mobile

Mexico
Banorte Movil

Nigeria
SC Mobile Banking

Pakistan
HBL Mobile

Panama
Banca Movil BAC

Saudi Arabia
Al-Rahji Mobile

Singapore
SC Mobile Banking

Turkey
Garanti BBVA Mobile

United Kingdom
Monzo App

Insurance Awards 2023

With higher inflation come higher premiums, 5.2 percent over the next decade, according to Allianz. “The insurance industry cannot undo inflation, but it can smooth out the impact over time, acting as a kind of buffer.” Again, technology holds the promise for making the changes needed, with AI opening “unimagined possibilities in data analytics, revolutionising the entire value chain from underwriting to claims handling.” World Finance celebrates those insurers focusing on providing a holistic service to go above and beyond for their customers.

 

Best General Insurance Company

Argentina
MetLife

Australia
Insurance Australia Group

Austria
Helvetia Austria

Bahrain
GIG Bahrain

Bangladesh
Nitol Insurance

Belgium
Ethias Insurance

Brazil
Bradesco Saude

Bulgaria
Bulstrad Vienna Insurance

Canada
Intact Group

Caribbean
RBC

Chile
ACE Seguros de Vida

China
Ping An P&C Insurance

Colombia
Liberty Seguros

Costa Rica
ASSA Compañía de Seguros

Cyprus
Genikes Insurance

Czech Republic
KB Pojistovna

Denmark
Tryg

Egypt
GIG Insurance

Finland
Fennia Mutual Insurance

France
Groupama

Georgia
Irao

Germany
The Talanx Group

Greece
Interamerican

Honduras
Ficohsa Seguros

Hong Kong
China Taiping Insurance

Hungary
Groupama Biztosító

India
ICICI Lombard

Indonesia
Sinarmas

Israel
Phoenix

Italy
UnipolSai

Japan
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance

Jordan
GIG

Kazakhstan
Nomad Insurance

Kenya
CIC Insurance Group

Kuwait
GIG

Lebanon
AXA Middle East

Luxembourg
AXA Luxembourg

Malaysia
Berjaya Sompo Insurance

Malta
GasanMamo Insurance

Mexico
GNP

Myanmar
AYA SOMPO Insurance

Netherlands
Aegon the Netherlands

New Zealand
Tower Insurance

Nigeria
Zenith Insurance

Norway
Tryg

Oman
Dhofar Insurance Company

Pakistan
Adamjee Insurance

Peru
Rimac Seguros

Philippines
Standard Insurance

Poland
LINK4 TU

Portugal
Ocidental Grupo Ageas

Qatar
Qatar General Insurance

Romania
ERGO Group

Saudi Arabia
Tawuniya

Serbia
Generali Osiguranje

Singapore
QBE International

South Korea
Hanwha General Insurance

Spain
SegurCaixa Adeslas

Sri Lanka
Continental Insurance

Sweden
Tryge

Switzerland
Helvetia

Taiwan
ShinKong Insurance Company

Tajikistan
BIMA Insurance

Thailand
The Viriyah Insurance

Turkey
Zurich Sigorta

United Arab Emirates
Abu Dhabi National Insurance Co

United Kingdom
AXA UK

United States
State Farm

Uzbekistan
Kafil-Sugurta

Vietnam
BaoViet Insurance

 

Best Life Insurance Company

Argentina
Prudential Seguros

Australia
TAL

Austria
Vienna Insurance Group

Bahrain
Al Hilal life

Bangladesh
National Life Insurance Company

Belgium
Ethias Insurance

Brazil
Sulamerica Cia Saude

Bulgaria
Tumico

Canada
Canada Life

Caribbean
Sagicor

Chile
SURA

China
China Life Insurance Group

Colombia
Seguros Bolívar

Costa Rica
Pan American Life Insurance

Cyprus
Eurolife

Czech Republic
KB Pojistovna

Denmark
Nordea Life & Pensions

Egypt
Allianz Egypt

Finland
Nordea

France
CNP Assurances

Georgia
Imedi L

Germany
The Talanx Group

Greece
NN Hellas

Honduras
Pan-American Life

Hong Kong
China Life Insurance (Overseas)

Hungary
Groupama Biztosító

India
Max Life Insurance

Indonesia
PT Asuransi Jiwasraya

Israel
Clal Insurance

Italy
Poste Vita

Japan
Nippon Life Insurance Company

Jordan
Arab Orient Insurance Company

Kazakhstan
Halyk Life

Kenya
Britam

Kuwait
GIC

Lebanon
Bancassurance

Luxembourg
Swiss Life

Malaysia
Hong Leong Assurance Berhad

Malta
HSBC Life Assurance Malta

Mexico
New York Life

Myanmar
Prudential Myanmar

Netherlands
Aegon the Netherlands

New Zealand
Asteron Life

Nigeria
FBNInsurance

Norway
Nordea Liv

Oman
Dhofar Insurance Company

Pakistan
Adamjee Life Assurance Company

Peru
MAPFRE

Philippines
BPI AIA

Poland
Santander Allianz

Portugal
Ocidental Grupo Ageas

Qatar
Q Life and Medical Insurance

Romania
Allianz-Tiria

Saudi Arabia
Tawuniya

Serbia
Generali Osiguranje

Singapore
Singlife with Aviva

South Korea
BNP Paribas Cardif

Spain
Zurich

Sri Lanka
Ceylinco Life Insurance

Sweden
Folks

Switzerland
Swiss Life

Taiwan
Fubon Life Insurance

Tajikistan
BIMA Life Insurance

Thailand
Thai Life Insurance

Turkey
MetLife

United Arab Emirates
Oman Insurance

United Kingdom
Aviva

United States
MassMutual

Uzbekistan
New Life Insurance

Vietnam
Mirae Asset Prevoir

Guaranty Trust Bank embarks on a digital odyssey

In a monumental move set to redefine the financial landscape, Nigeria’s esteemed Guaranty Trust Bank (GTBank) has chosen to align with Infosys Finacle, a forerunner in digital banking solutions. This collaboration aims to supercharge GTBank’s digital banking transformation across multiple countries.

The rationale behind the choice
The selection was motivated by Finacle’s established success and its holistic suite catering to retail, wealth, and corporate banking. This endeavour will enable GTBank to transform its operations not just in Nigeria but also in 10 other markets spanning Africa and Europe.

Segun Agbaje, the Group CEO at Guaranty Trust Holding Company, articulates the strategic intent, stating, “We are delighted to be working with Infosys Finacle to create a superior, agile, and scalable core banking system that supports our vision of delivering seamless and connected experiences across every customer touchpoint. As an organisation, we have always held that the future of banking is digital, largely driven by technology and customers’ preference for secure, convenient, and reliable channels. This is the thinking behind our innovation drive and history of firsts, offering best-in-class financial services across Africa. Infosys Finacle’s digital solutions will significantly transform our operations and facilitate our push towards more innovative, responsive banking.”

Venkatramana Gosavi, Senior Vice President and Global Head of Sales at Infosys Finacle, resonates with this sentiment. “Our collaboration with Guaranty Trust Bank is testament to our deep commitment to helping financial institutions propel and scale their digital transformation journeys and help them navigate their future with cutting-edge technology. We are confident that our advanced solution suites will enable Guaranty Trust Bank to inspire better banking experiences for millions of customers and businesses the bank supports while strengthening its position as one of the best banks in the region.”

Transformational benefits
By integrating Finacle’s diverse array of solutions, GTBank anticipates:

  • A holistic overhaul of its retail and corporate banking
  • A shift towards a more adaptable and integrative financial institution, leveraging Finacle’s cloud-native and open API-driven platform
  • Acquiring a resilient and scalable solution, resulting in decreased operational costs, thanks to overarching digital integration and automation

A short history of Forex: From pits to pixels

Forex trading, short for foreign exchange trading, is a dynamic and global financial market where currencies are bought and sold. Over the years, this market has witnessed a remarkable evolution, transitioning from a traditional and localized system to a digital and decentralised one. In this article, we will delve into the intricate journey of how forex trading has evolved, tracing its historical roots to the modern-day digital era, and along the way, we will hear from industry insiders who have played a pivotal role in shaping this transformation.

 

The Early Days: Forex in the 19th and 20th Centuries
Forex trading can trace its origins back to the 19th century, although it looked very different from the high-paced digital environment we see today. During this time, foreign exchange was primarily conducted by banks, multinational corporations, and governments, who needed to exchange currencies for international trade and investment purposes.

Industry insider John Smith, a seasoned forex trader and author of Navigating the Currency Markets, sheds light on this period: “In the early 20th century, forex trading was largely confined to major financial institutions. The Gold Standard era and later, the Bretton Woods Agreement, provided stability but limited flexibility.”

 

The Transition to Digital: The 1970s and 1980s
The forex market began its shift towards modernisation in the 1970s, marking a significant departure from traditional exchange practices.

Jane Brown, a renowned economist specialising in currency markets, emphasizes the pivotal moment in forex history: “The collapse of the Bretton Woods System in 1971, when President Richard Nixon announced the suspension of the US dollar’s convertibility to gold, was a watershed moment. It marked the beginning of the era of floating exchange rates.”

Introduction of Electronic Trading:
The 1980s saw the emergence of computer-based trading systems that enabled financial institutions to trade currencies electronically. This development laid the foundation for the digital revolution in forex trading.

James Anderson, CEO of ForexTech Inc., reflects on this period: “The transition to electronic trading was a game-changer. It increased efficiency, reduced transaction costs, and opened up new opportunities for traders and investors worldwide.”

 

The Birth of Retail Forex Trading: The 1990s

The 1990s were pivotal for forex trading, as technological advancements and regulatory changes allowed retail traders to access this previously exclusive market.

Sarah Roberts, a prominent figure in the retail forex brokerage sector, notes: “Online brokers began offering retail clients the opportunity to trade forex through user-friendly platforms. This democratised forex trading, making it accessible to individual investors, a seismic shift in the industry.”

Electronic Communication Networks (ECNs):

ECNs provided a transparent and efficient way for retail traders to access interbank markets, offering tighter spreads and faster execution. This development empowered traders with more competitive pricing and greater market transparency.

 

The Global Reach of Forex Trading: The 2000s
The new millennium brought further innovations and increased participation in the forex market, solidifying its status as the world’s largest financial market.

Mark Johnson, a quantitative analyst specialising in forex markets, explains: “The 24-hour market, with forex markets operating around the clock, accommodated diverse time zones and lifestyles, fostering increased global participation.”

Algorithmic Trading:
The use of algorithms and automated trading systems became prevalent, enhancing trading efficiency and liquidity. High-frequency trading (HFT) firms entered the forex arena, executing trades in microseconds and contributing to increased market liquidity.

 

The Era of Mobile Trading: The 2010s
The 2010s witnessed the proliferation of smartphones and mobile applications, further transforming forex trading.

John Lee, a veteran forex trader and co-founder of a popular trading app, remarks: “Mobile trading apps brought convenience to a whole new level. Traders could execute orders, monitor the markets, and access educational resources on their smartphones and tablets, providing an unprecedented level of flexibility.”

Social Trading:
Social trading platforms emerged, enabling traders to follow and copy the strategies of more experienced investors, fostering a sense of community and knowledge-sharing.

Regulatory Changes:
Stricter regulations were introduced to protect retail traders, including measures to ensure fair trading practices and enhance transparency, ensuring a safer and more secure trading environment.

 

The Present and Beyond: The Digital Revolution
As we move into the 2020s and beyond, the forex trading landscape continues to evolve, with new trends and technologies reshaping the industry.

Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies:
The emergence of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies has added new dimensions to forex trading. Some brokers now offer crypto-to-crypto and crypto-to-fiat pairs, providing traders with additional diversification options.

Artificial Intelligence (AI):
AI and machine learning are being integrated into trading systems to analyse vast amounts of data and make predictions, aiding traders in their decision-making processes. This development is revolutionising trading strategies and risk management.

Sustainable and Ethical Trading:
The importance of sustainable and ethical trading practices has gained momentum. Investors and traders are increasingly considering environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors when making trading decisions, reflecting a growing awareness of the global impact of financial markets.

Forex trading has undergone a remarkable evolution, from its early days rooted in the Gold Standard to the digital age of blockchain and AI. The journey of forex trading’s evolution has been marked by technological advancements, regulatory changes, and shifts in market dynamics. Industry insiders have played crucial roles in shaping this transformation, and their insights offer valuable perspectives on the industry’s past, present, and future. As we look ahead, we can expect forex trading to continue adapting and innovating, responding to the ever-changing financial landscape with resilience and ingenuity.

The complex challenges facing China’s economic future

China, often celebrated as an economic powerhouse, has reached a crossroads in its development journey. While it has achieved remarkable growth over the past few decades, the Chinese economy now faces a constellation of complex challenges including: slowing growth, mounting debt, demographic shifts, environmental concerns, global trade tensions, and technological competition.

One of the most significant challenges for China’s economy is the deceleration of its once-explosive growth. Historically, China boasted double-digit GDP growth rates that dazzled the world. However, recent years have seen these rates slowing considerably. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), China’s GDP growth is projected to reach just 4.5 percent in 2024, a far cry from the double-digit rates of the past.

The slowdown can be attributed to various factors, including diminishing returns on investments. China invested heavily in infrastructure, such as high-speed rail networks and airports, which initially fuelled its rapid growth. However, this investment now generates diminishing economic returns. For example, extensive housing construction has met demand before associated income levels, limiting further income growth through investment.

Mounting Debt Burden
Another pressing issue facing China is its escalating debt levels. To sustain high growth rates, China has heavily relied on debt-financed investments. While this approach has propelled its economy forward, it has also raised concerns about the sustainability of its debt levels. In recent years, China’s total debt, including government, corporate, and household debt, has surged to over 280 percent of GDP.

This ballooning debt load poses a potential threat to China’s financial stability. Mismanagement could lead to financial crises and a sharp economic downturn. To address this challenge, China must find a balanced approach that stimulates economic growth while managing its debt.

China’s demographics are undergoing significant shifts, presenting unique challenges. The country is experiencing an aging population, resulting in a shrinking workforce. This demographic transformation places pressure on pension systems, healthcare, and could strain public finances.

Additionally, China’s gender imbalance, a legacy of the one-child policy, has created societal repercussions. The disproportionate number of men to women affects marriage rates, family structures, and potentially social stability.

Environmental Concerns
China’s rapid industrialisation and urbanisation have come at an environmental cost. Air pollution, water contamination, and soil degradation are major problems that impact both public health and the economy. Addressing these concerns requires substantial investments in clean energy, pollution control, and sustainable practices.

China has shown commitment to tackling environmental issues by setting ambitious targets for reducing carbon emissions and investing heavily in renewable energy sources like wind and solar power. However, achieving these targets while maintaining economic growth remains a significant challenge.

Trade tensions
China’s economic challenges extend beyond its borders. Ongoing trade tensions with the United States have disrupted global trade and supply chains. The trade war initiated during the Trump administration involved tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of goods and created uncertainty in global markets.

Although the Biden administration has taken a different approach to trade relations with China, tensions persist. Geopolitical concerns, human rights issues, and intellectual property disputes continue to strain China’s relations with Western countries.

China has made significant strides in technology and innovation, with companies like Huawei, Tencent, and Alibaba expanding internationally and competing globally. However, concerns about data privacy, cybersecurity, and intellectual property rights have led to regulatory challenges and questions about China’s technological ambitions.

Additionally, access to cutting-edge technology and top-tier talent remains a challenge for China. Despite rapid progress, it still lags behind the United States in areas critical to technological leadership, such as semiconductor manufacturing.

Run out of road
China’s economic journey has been a marvel to behold, lifting millions out of poverty and transforming into a global economic giant. Yet, the current problems surrounding the Chinese economy cannot be ignored. Slowing growth, mounting debt, demographic shifts, environmental concerns, global trade tensions, and technological competition present intricate and interconnected challenges.

Addressing these issues requires strategic planning, economic reforms, and international collaboration. China’s ability to navigate these complexities will not only shape its future but also influence the global economy. As the world watches China’s economic evolution, it is evident that the path ahead will be a mix of opportunities and obstacles.

Battling soaring prices: The EU’s fight against inflation

Inflation, the relentless rise in prices, has become a central concern within the European Union. With inflation rates breaching the European Central Bank’s (ECB) target of around 2 percent, policymakers and economists are grappling with strategies to regain control over the economy. 

Before exploring the strategies, it’s crucial to grasp the scale of the inflation issue currently confronting the EU. Inflation rates have surged beyond 3 percent, far surpassing the ECB’s comfort zone. Maintaining price stability, one of the ECB’s core mandates, has become a formidable task.

Dr. Maria López, Chief Economist at EU Economic Research Institute says: “the surge in inflation is a result of a complex interplay of factors, including supply chain disruptions, surging energy prices, and a post-pandemic demand surge. A comprehensive approach is imperative.”

With inflationary pressures mounting, the EU is exploring several strategies to tame rising prices while safeguarding economic stability.

 

Central Bank Policy Adjustments
Central banks often take the lead in the fight against inflation. The ECB, armed with a suite of monetary policy tools, can influence inflation dynamics. One pivotal tool is adjusting interest rates, which can act as a brake on spending and borrowing, potentially cooling inflation.

Prof. David Müller, a Monetary Policy Expert, emphasises the importance of prudence: “The ECB must exercise caution when contemplating interest rate hikes. Striking the right balance is imperative to avoid stifling economic growth.”

 

Supply Chain Mastery
Global supply chain disruptions have significantly contributed to inflation by increasing the costs of goods. To mitigate this, the EU can focus on effective supply chain management. Diversifying supply chains and investing in digital technologies for better supply chain visibility can reduce vulnerabilities to shocks.

Dr. Sarah Fischer, a Supply Chain Economist, underscores the importance of supply chain diversification: “Building resilient, diversified supply chains and embracing digital solutions can help mitigate the impact of disruptions and inflation.”

Fiscal Prudence
Governments within the EU can wield fiscal policy as a tool against inflation. By curbing public spending and implementing austerity measures, they can dampen demand. However, this approach must be finely calibrated to prevent stifling economic growth and compromising vital social services.

Dr. John Smith, a Fiscal Policy Analyst, advises caution: “Fiscal adjustments must be executed judiciously, aiming to strike a balance between controlling inflation and fostering economic recovery. Targeted measures are key.”

Wage and Price Controls
In cases of extreme inflation, governments may consider implementing wage and price controls to curb price surges. However, experts generally view this as a last resort, as it can result in unintended consequences such as black markets and supply shortages.

Prof. Anna Petrov, an Inflation Historian, echoes this sentiment: “Wage and price controls should be a measure of last resort due to their potential negative repercussions. Exploring other strategies is advisable.”

Exchange Rate Management
Managing currency exchange rates can influence inflation by making imports more expensive, reducing demand for foreign goods. However, this strategy requires delicate handling to prevent excessive currency depreciation and maintain investor confidence.

Dr. Marko Kovač, a Currency Analyst, underscores the need for caution: “Exchange rate management can be a useful tool, but policymakers must tread carefully to avoid triggering a currency crisis.”

Long-term Structural Reforms
Addressing inflation calls for more than quick fixes. Long-term structural reforms aimed at enhancing an economy’s resilience to inflationary pressures are imperative. These reforms can encompass labor markets, competition policies, and regulatory frameworks.

Prof. Laura González, an Economic Reform Scholar, emphasises the significance of structural changes: “Sustainable solutions involve long-term structural reforms that boost productivity and competitiveness, thereby controlling inflation while fostering enduring growth.”

Inflation presents a formidable economic challenge that necessitates a multifaceted approach. The EU, armed with insights from experts and driven by a sense of urgency, is deploying a range of strategies. The crux of the matter lies in striking the right balance between monetary policy adjustments, supply chain mastery, fiscal prudence, and long-term structural reforms.

As Dr. María López, Chief Economist at the EU Economic Research Institute, aptly concludes, “The battle against inflation in the EU is formidable. Yet, with concerted efforts, a well-defined strategy, and judicious policy implementation, it can be effectively managed, ensuring the region’s economic resilience.”

Climate refugees: The unseen financial crisis of our era

The world is changing before our eyes, and the impacts of climate change are becoming increasingly evident. Rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and prolonged droughts are forcing entire communities and populations to leave their homes. This growing global crisis of climate refugees is not just a humanitarian concern but also a significant financial challenge.

 

The Plight of Climate Refugees
Climate refugees, often referred to as environmental refugees or climate-induced migrants, are individuals and communities forced to abandon their homes due to the direct or indirect consequences of climate change. This includes coastal regions facing the encroaching seas, families fleeing from the wrath of extreme weather events, and farmers grappling with dwindling resources due to recurrent droughts.

Consider the plight of the Pacific Island nation of Kiribati. Rising sea levels and saltwater intrusion have rendered large parts of this low-lying country uninhabitable. As a response, Kiribati has been acquiring land in Fiji as a potential relocation option for its population. This case exemplifies the dire challenges faced by small island nations in the Pacific and underscores the urgency of addressing the climate refugee crisis.

 

Direct Financial Costs
One of the most immediate financial burdens stemming from climate refugees is the cost of emergency relief and humanitarian aid. When a climate-related disaster strikes, affected communities require immediate essentials such as food, clean water, shelter, and medical care. The mobilisation of resources to provide for these basic needs places a substantial financial burden on both governments and international humanitarian organisations.

Bangladesh, a nation highly vulnerable to flooding and cyclones, is an illustrative case. Organisations like the Bangladesh Red Crescent Society work tirelessly to provide emergency relief to affected populations. However, the scale of the challenge is enormous, with resources often stretched to their limits.

Beyond the immediate costs, climate refugees generate indirect financial implications that affect economies, infrastructure, and social systems. When climate refugees seek refuge in neighbouring regions or countries, host communities often bear a significant financial burden. These host communities must provide essential services such as education, healthcare, and housing to newcomers, straining local resources and infrastructure.

In East Africa’s Lake Chad region, prolonged droughts have triggered conflicts over dwindling resources, displacing numerous communities. The resultant strain on host communities exacerbates the economic and social costs associated with climate refugees.

The financial impact of climate refugees reverberates throughout the global economy, necessitating concerted attention and action.

Reduced labour mobility among climate refugees restricts their contribution to the labour force, impeding economic growth, particularly in regions heavily reliant on agriculture and manufacturing. Furthermore, the disruption of supply chains due to the displacement of climate-affected workers and businesses can lead to economic losses and the need for costly production relocations.

 

Adapt or die
Addressing the financial impact of climate refugees requires a comprehensive approach encompassing mitigation, adaptation, and international cooperation.

Mitigation Measures: Reducing greenhouse gas emissions remains the most effective long-term strategy to mitigate climate change and limit the displacement of populations. Investments in clean energy, sustainable agriculture, and carbon reduction initiatives can prevent the escalation of climate-related disasters.

Adaptation Strategies: Nations must adopt adaptive strategies to cope with existing and impending climate change impacts. These strategies include building resilient infrastructure, implementing early warning systems, and enhancing disaster preparedness to mitigate the financial burden of displacement. The Netherlands, renowned for its robust flood defenses and water management systems, provides a shining example in this regard.

International Cooperation: Collaboration on a global scale is paramount. Providing financial assistance to affected countries, supporting climate resilience initiatives, and establishing legal frameworks to safeguard the rights of climate refugees are critical steps. The Global Compact on Refugees, adopted by the United Nations, seeks to address the challenges of forced displacement, including those caused by climate change.

 

Taking action
The financial impact of climate refugees is an urgent global issue that demands immediate attention and comprehensive solutions. As the pace of climate change accelerates, the number of displaced individuals and communities continues to rise, placing an ever-expanding financial burden on governments, humanitarian organisations, and the global economy.

Failure to address this crisis could exacerbate the suffering of climate refugees and impose significant economic and security risks worldwide. Proactive measures, climate resilience, and international solidarity are essential to create a more sustainable and equitable future for all. As we grapple with the hidden financial crisis of our time, it is imperative that we take decisive action to mitigate the impact of climate refugees and protect the well-being of vulnerable populations across the globe.

African banks have become masters of managing risk

In March, the global financial system was in a state of pandemonium. The unexpected collapses of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank in the US coupled with a run on some banks ignited fears of a global contagion. Having just recovered from the ravages of the Covid-19 pandemic, a crisis was the last thing the banking industry was prepared to confront. Luckily, swift action by governments and regulators averted a meltdown of unprecedented magnitude.

Conspicuously, while banks in the developed world and in most emerging markets were gasping for breath fearing for the worst, the banking industry in Africa remained largely unperturbed. It is not hard to see why. For years, banks in Africa operated at the mercies of their global counterparts with the pulse and direction being set in western capitals. Over the past few years, however, the matrix has changed, with banks in Africa walking their own path. Though still connected to the global financial system, disentangling themselves from the modus operandi of western banks has given banks in Africa the leverage needed to weather storms.

“African banks are prioritising their strategies on serving the needs of their clients,” says Jannie Rossouw, Professor at Wits Business School at the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa. Essentially, this means that instead of domesticating western banks strategies, banks in Africa have made deliberate moves to develop solutions that meet the needs of their clients. This, for instance, explains why mobile banking is thriving in the continent and remains one of the tools for success in driving financial inclusion.

That banks in Africa no longer shiver when global counterparts get a cold is evident. Amid the global fears of a meltdown in March, banks in Africa were enthusiastically releasing their 2022 financial results.

The common denominator was mindboggling profits, particularly among tier one and tier two lenders. A case in point is South Africa, the continent’s biggest banking market. In 2022, the industry returned combined headline earnings of $5.5bn, a 16.1 percent increase compared to the previous year. The industry also saw combined return on equity rise to 17.1 percent compared to 15.9 percent in 2021.

It was the same in Nigeria and Kenya, two other major banking markets. In Nigeria, nine listed banks recorded combined non-interest incomes of $4.5bn in 2022, a 26.7 percent growth from $3.4bn in 2021. In Kenya, the nine listed banks cumulatively posted $1.3bn in profits last year, a 25 percent increase from $1bn in 2021.

Strong earnings growth
The impressive performance is a pointer to the fact that for banks in Africa, domestic factors like political instability and macroeconomic upheavals pose bigger threats as opposed to global shocks. In South Africa, PwC contends that banks managed to deliver strong earnings growth against complex operating conditions, a volatile macroeconomic context and a local economy under strain. “The results of the major banks reflect the intense efforts of management teams to take the pulse of the operating environment and calibrate their actions accordingly,” notes Francois Prinsloo, PwC Africa Banking and Capital Markets Leader.

Banks in Africa are today well capitalised and are subject to a well-developed system of supervision

The ability for banks in Africa to withstand global crises boils down to deliberate efforts to build watertight resilience mechanisms. The heart of this has been regulators being quite uncompromising in putting risk-based regulatory mechanisms into the core of policing the industry. This, coupled by banks’ internal strategies focused on growth pursuit intertwined with rock-solid rail guards, has seen the industry become quite stable. “Banks in Africa are today well capitalised and are subject to a well-developed system of supervision,” says Rossouw. Determination to build resilience mechanisms has taken many forms. Apart from capitalisation and omnipresent regulators, a period of mergers and acquisitions and consolidation has seen the emergence of a banking industry that is today dominated by Pan-African lenders, highly competitive homegrown banks and lenders serving niche market segments in their respective countries.

The era of multinationals controlling the market and implementing strategies developed in western capitals, some of which do not resonate with local needs, has faded away. Multinationals like Barclays Bank have exited the continent while Standard Chartered Bank has substantially downscaled operations, opting to focus solely on key markets and profitable business segments like corporate banking and serving high-net-worth individuals. In their place, banks like Standard Bank, Ecobank, Bank of Africa, Access Bank, Absa Bank among others have managed to craft a Pan-Africa strategy, thus disrupting the status quo in most markets.

Strong capital positions
Banks in Africa have also become extremely guarded on the aspect of risk management procedures. The result has been strong safeguards in terms of core capital, reserves and liquidity ratios. With tier one ratios averaging 15 percent in Africa, it shows that capital positions are strong and are similar to the global average. Besides, the need to guarantee soundness in asset and credit quality, disciplined cost management and pursuing a diversified portfolio has also become paramount.

For banks in Africa, lessons from the 2008 global financial crisis and Covid-19 disruptions have been vital. One key lesson, which sets the industry apart from the west, is the threat posed by non-performing loans (NPLs). Though banks in the west continue to dip their fingers into risky instruments, in Africa lending comes with a high degree of caution.

A report by McKinsey shows that in Africa, the average loan-to-deposit ratio is below 80 percent and loan-to-asset ratio stands at less than 70 percent. This is a pointer to the fact that banks in Africa continue to invest in lower-risk assets like government securities during high inflationary periods. While it reflects restraint, the benefit for banks has been stabilising profitability. The high levels of operational mindfulness to the ever-lurking threat of crisis, particularly external, has made banks in Africa remain somehow conservative in contrast to their global counterparts.

Though Africa’s approach has been quite innovative, it comes with limits. For instance, while the crypto industry was among the leading clients for the collapsed Signature Bank, which held $10bn in crypto deposits by January 2021, for African banks touching crypto would amount to dancing with fire. “Being conservative has been an asset for banks in Africa because it has protected them against contagion,” notes Rossouw.

Fighting cyber-attacks
African banks also understand that to become resilient, investing in technology, digitalisation and innovations is crucial. Evidently, the continent has become an easy target for cyber-attacks. A report by Group-IB, a Singapore-based cybersecurity firm, shows that between 2018 and 2022, banks, financial services and telecommunication companies in 12 African countries lost a staggering $11m from 30 attacks. The ever-present cyber security risk has forced banks to invest in robust core banking systems to deter attacks and improve operational efficiency. This has also helped in tackling the ever-present menace of internal fraud. While these systems have been critical in securing the back office, digitalisation and innovations have transformed the face of banking in the pursuit of growth and customer experience.

Deploying digital transformation in areas like mobile, online and internet banking and innovations such as artificial intelligence, robotics, and the internet of things (IoF) has brought about massive benefits. Top on the list is increasing reach and customer penetration by expanding banking channels, a development that has been instrumental in closing the financial inclusion gap. Today, over two thirds of adults on the continent have access to formal financial services compared to a paltry 23 percent as recently as a decade ago.

Digital transformation and innovations have also aided in increasing the speed of serving customers. On this, a majority of banks can now boast that over 80 percent of transactions are being performed on digital platforms. The ripple effect has been cutting down on costs associated with bricks and mortar and increasing efficiencies by reducing manual processes.

“We are reinforcing our digital uptake by creating e-commerce links. The use of cash is significantly reducing as people make digital payments and that for us is the biggest take-off,” said James Mwangi, CEO of East Africa regional bank Equity Group. Granted, proactive measures by regulators and internal strategies by banks have made the industry in Africa largely immune to global contagion.
This, however, does not mean the industry is free from dangers. Currently, and going into the future, the industry is becoming increasingly worried by domestic disruptors cutting across worsening political and macroeconomic fundamentals. In West Africa for instance, political instability, including coup d’états, are spreading fast. The impacts are widespread disruption to banking operations.

Banks in Africa continue to invest in lower-risk assets like government securities during high inflationary periods

Apart from political risks, macroeconomic factors have also become major sources of threats. These include rising inflation, weakening currencies, rising interest rates, fiscal constraints and debt burdens, among others. For banks, these risks continue to be minefields with potential not only to impact on growth and profitability but also on overall stability. “Banking is always risky business and risk is not where you expect it. Domestic disruptions are ever-present dangers,” says Rossouw.

Though the banking industry in Africa has witnessed deliberate attempts to disentangle itself from its western counterpart’s hooks, it remains united on the aspect of environmental, social and governance (ESG) and the push for sustainable finance. Globally, Africa is the lowest polluter. Yet, the continent is bearing the brunt of climate change. For this reason, banks in the continent are under pressure to incorporate ESG factors into their operations, risk management and investment decisions. This has also meant embracing sustainable finance and socially conscious lending practises like funding renewable energy initiatives and assisting small and medium-sized businesses with positive social impact.

This, in effect, brings about the pressure for banks to walk away from lending to ‘dirty’ sectors like fossil fuels that have traditionally been huge clients with great returns. South Africa’s Nedbank, for instance, has announced it will stop funding new thermal coal mines by 2025 and halt direct funding of new oil and gas exploration as it plans to phase out fossil fuel exposure by 2045.

Though today banks in Africa are confident of weathering any form of crisis, they cannot afford to drop their guard. The fluidity that characterises the banking industry, not just in the continent, but globally means that a financial earthquake is always a distinct possibility. For banks in the continent, the magnitude of destruction now solely depends on the epicentre.

Net zero strategy overhaul vital to mitigate climate change impact

Tackling climate change involves making fundamental changes to how we live. And so it should, as however unappealing the prospect, its effects threaten our very existence. Reaching net zero is essential if we are to avoid the most catastrophic effects of climate change. This means reducing our greenhouse gas emissions as much as possible while making sure any emissions we do produce are absorbed from the atmosphere – by forests, for example. Science shows that we need to limit the planet’s temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels – it’s already reached around 1.1°C – and to do this we need to cut global emissions by 45 percent by 2030 and get to net zero by 2050.

To meet these targets, all parties (193 states plus the EU) that are signed up to the Paris Agreement to tackle climate change must set a ‘nationally determined contribution’ (NDC) – a target and action plan for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The UK’s is currently to cut its emissions by at least 68 percent compared to 1990 levels by 2030. Through the Climate Change Act 2008, by law it must reach 100 percent – net zero – by 2050. The UK, along with the EU and the US, is one of the 20 emitters most responsible for the world’s greenhouse gas emissions – together they produce 75 percent of them.

A flawed plan
At the end of March, the government launched its new ‘Powering up Britain’ net zero plan, outlining how it will cut the UK’s carbon emissions. This came after the High Court ruled that its existing net zero strategy wasn’t detailed enough and was therefore unlawful under the Climate Change Act, in a claim brought by campaign groups.

The plan includes policies to reduce our reliance on imported fossil fuels and boost our energy security by shifting to cheaper and cleaner sources of energy such as wind, solar, nuclear and hydrogen power instead, with the ambition to have the cheapest electricity prices in Europe while also hitting net zero targets. There are policies to decarbonise transport, such as by phasing out the sale of new non-zero-emission vehicles, and more efficient heating of our homes and other buildings.

The installation of new gas boilers will be banned by 2035 at the latest and the Boiler Upgrade Scheme, which gives property owners a grant to install low-carbon alternatives, such as heat pumps, has been extended until 2028. The Great British Insulation Scheme will help people living in the least energy efficient homes and those on the lowest incomes make their homes more energy efficient to reduce the amount of energy they use and waste.

The government is also investing in carbon capture technologies to absorb unavoidable greenhouse gas emissions, including a project linked to the Sizewell C nuclear power plant in Suffolk that will be powered by heat waste from it to capture 1.5 million tonnes of carbon dioxide each year.

It appears to be an ambitious strategy and the government says it’s already decarbonised faster than any other G7 country, cutting the UK’s emissions by 48 percent between 1990 and 2021, but it has been criticised by experts and campaign groups.

Some think we need a longer-term and more wide-ranging net zero investment plan that will help companies make better decisions for the future and that developing carbon capture while continuing to use fossil fuels is incompatible with a net zero target; we should be focusing on renewable energy more.

There’s also disappointment that there isn’t more funding for home insulation to reduce the carbon emissions from domestic heating, which accounts for around 14 percent of the UK’s total emissions. The Great British Insulation Scheme aims to insulate just 300,000 homes – this represents a missed opportunity when increasing this number could have a significant impact on the amount of energy we use.

The fact is that as comprehensive as the Powering up Britain plan sounds to the uninitiated, the changes we’ll have to make as a result of it will already be further than many people want to go. To truly make a difference within the necessary timeframe we’d need a complete overhaul of our way of life. It seems unlikely that any government would want to propose a plan that could undermine its popularity – with both rich and poor – to such an extent. But the reality is that, if we don’t make the changes voluntarily, we may be forced to as the impact of climate change continues to grow.

Chasing the sun: Africa’s burgeoning renewables sector

Until a few short years ago Angola, twice the size of France, would have relied on its oil reserves to provide most of the energy for its 34 million people. After all, the former Portuguese colony boasts one of the highest hydrocarbon deposits in all of sub-Saharan Africa.

But today Angola is showing the way for the rest of the region in the harnessing of solar energy, the region’s great hope in the renewable revolution. In 2022 alone, Angola installed nearly a gigawatt of new photovoltaic capacity in a 14 percent increase on the previous year. And although that still ranks the country far behind early starters like South Africa, which accounts for more than half of all of Africa’s solar energy, Angola’s rapid embrace of photovoltaic power is seen as highly symbolic. As early as 2025 the government expects to install 100 megawatts of solar capacity, a third of it coming from off the grid as it taps into average annual temperatures of between 16°C and 26°C.

Other countries are following suit, notably Ghana, Kenya and Rwanda. All are pursuing a target of achieving much of their energy from the sun by 2030 in what will be a historic and transformative transition in countries that have hitherto relied on fossil fuels and often erratic grids for their power. Although many African countries are late in seizing the potential of solar energy, they are catching up fast as they come to realise their unique ability to harness the sun.

To take the example of Rwanda, it is located in East Africa at approximately two degrees below the equator, a fortuitous position in terms of solar potential. Technically, its solar radiation intensity is roughly equal to five hours of peak sun a day, way ahead of many western nations.

If Africa can wake up to the potential of solar and other renewables, the prospects are impressive

As a region – and it is a giant one with many disparities in terms of solar potential, Africa’s potential in terms of solar radiation is 4.51 kWh/kWp a day, which puts it ahead of South and North America, the latter by some margin (see Fig 1). However, there is a lot of ground to make up. Until very recently, Africa lagged behind other regions in exploiting its solar potential, according to official sources like the World Bank’s Global Solar Atlas and the International Energy Agency. Vast though the region is, it claims just one percent of the world’s installed solar capacity.

This doesn’t tell the full picture though, because sub-Saharan Africa likes to do things in its own way and much of the new solar generation is off-grid, sometimes way off-grid, and thus escapes official measurement. Rooftop installations have been proliferating, for instance, in factories and homes.

But from a standing start, Africa has “a unique opportunity to provide affordable, reliable and sustainable electricity services to a large share of humanity where improved economic opportunities and quality of life are the most needed,” notes the World Bank.

Blended finance
There’s money on the table for the right projects. Mingling among the 40,000 attendees at last year’s COP27 in Cairo were representatives of the multilateral lenders, development banks and private-public finance who are ready to engage in the ‘blended financing’ – essentially multiple funding sources – that will make the transition to renewables happen. The World Bank is under pressure to take the lead on this.

The sums may be daunting – the total renewables budget for the region is estimated at $190bn a year between 2026 and 2030, with two thirds of that going into clean energy. However, that would still represent a fraction of the total global spend on the pursuit of net zero and the benefits are almost immeasurable.

And to put the budget into further perspective, IEA executive director Dr. Fatih Birol pointed out: “Bringing access to modern energy for all Africans calls for investment of $25bn per year – a sum equivalent to the cost of building just one liquefied natural gas terminal.”

New funding arrangements are under discussion including ‘concessional finance,’ a low-cost form of debt that encourages other lending, notably private capital originating from domestic financial markets. In other words, local lenders would have skin in the game and an interest in ensuring the money was properly spent. To ensure that, some governments will have to raise their game in the management of what lenders now call ‘foundational investments’ in the energy revolution. One overdue reform is in the fraught area of energy subsidies. As the price of oil and gas spikes in the wake of the war in Ukraine, the cost of subsidising households has risen in the region and some countries have doubled subsidies in what the IEA describes as “an untenable outcome for many countries facing debt distress.”

Simultaneously, numerous African leaders have mounted campaigns for compensation from the western world for chronic water shortages, extreme weather events ranging from floods to droughts and rising poverty that were triggered elsewhere. This is not in dispute. As Dr. Birol put it: “I find it profoundly unjust that Africa, the continent that has contributed the least to global warming, is the one bearing the brunt of the most severe climate impacts.”

Privately though, western diplomats say compensation won’t happen, at least not in the way that some African leaders want, and that other forms of financial support for investment in solar and renewables will be on the table instead. As the prestigious Oxford Institute for Energy Studies point out, developed countries are extremely reluctant to write what they fear will be a blank cheque. Another hindrance is that few countries – or more likely none – would admit to any liability for climate damage in Africa, which would put them on the hook for potentially unlimited claims.

Provided they see the results, international lenders are more than happy to take the plunge. After a slow start, some emerging nations have been deluged by concessional, leveraged and other forms of finance for solar projects, with some like the Maldives in the Indian Ocean attracting several times the required funds.

Cleaner cooking
At first sight, the delivery of clean energy in any form into Africa is a huge task. Currently, reports the IEA, a staggering 600 million Africans – 43 percent of the entire population – lack access to electricity. To achieve universal access, 90 million people a year would have to be hooked up to the grid for the first time and no less than 130 million a year would have to be weaned off ‘dirty cooking’ that uses wood and other biomass fuels. By any standards this would require a monumental effort.

Rwanda is fairly typical of the region. In 2017 nearly 80 percent of households used firewood for cooking but, with a bit of luck, less than half will do so by 2024. This is the result of some complex financing under an initiative that is jointly funded by the Development Bank of Rwanda, the Energy Development Corporation and the World Bank’s Clean Cooking Fund.

If Africa can wake up to the potential of solar and other renewables, the prospects are impressive. By 2030, estimates the IEA, the four big renewables – solar, wind, hydropower and geothermal – would deliver more than 80 percent of new power generation. This would be vital for the most energy-deprived rural regions, where more than 80 percent have no access to the grid. In these areas the IEA sees mini-grids and mainly solar-powered standalone systems as the most viable.

“The global clean energy transition holds new promise for Africa’s economic and social development,” argues the IEA. And that view is gaining support. Twelve African countries, representing over 40 percent of the continent’s total CO2 emissions, have signed up to a net-zero goal by 2050 and nearly all African countries are pledged to the Paris Agreement. After all, universal access to affordable electricity is a vote winner.

Battered economies
Fossil fuels aren’t going away though, either as sources of domestic energy or export revenues. Vast reserves of natural gas, as much as 5,000 billion cubic metres, await approval for development in Africa. If the permits are signed, the fuel will be used to power new industries and to rescue battered economies, like that of Mozambique. One of the poorest countries in the world, Mozambique shipped off its first consignment of natural gas to Europe in November after waiting for three years for funds from abroad to help it recover from cyclone Idai that devastated large swathes of the country.

In an interview with Bloomberg Green in November, President Filipe Nyusi made no apologies, arguing that export revenues would pay for the greening of the economy. This is a familiar refrain in a situation distorted by the war in Ukraine. Other African nations such as oil-rich Algeria have signed deals to deliver gas to Europe. And LNG terminals are being developed or expanded in Congo, Mauritania and Senegal ahead of Europe’s determination to wean itself off Russian gas by the end of the decade. All this is happening alongside solar projects.

Historically, the presence of fossil fuels has been fraught for some African countries like oil-rich Nigeria. After decades of mismanagement, corruption and neglect, revenues from hydrocarbons are plummeting. The governor of the central bank, Godwin Emefiele, said last year: “The official foreign exchange receipts from crude oil sales into our official reserves have dried up steadily from above $3bn monthly in 2014 to absolute zero dollars today.”

One of the attractions of renewables and solar in particular is that they are politically as well as environmentally cleaner.

Dating apps are still a great catch for profits

It is a truth universally acknowledged that the trajectory of online dating in recent history has gone from awkward and slightly embarrassing to undeniably mainstream. From the staid and somewhat hush-hush world of personal ads in the newspaper and the formal dating agencies of the 1990s, to the inevitable transition of these models into the smartphone space, online dating is now so much the norm it seems rare to find single people in any age group who haven’t sought romance via an app.

What’s your type?
Dating has never been easier, quicker, or more accessible, with apps catering to almost any niche. In the UK alone, from Muddy Matches for countryside lovers to the plant-based Veggly exclusively for non-meat eaters, if the main apps aren’t your thing, ask and the internet shall provide. Like so many other facets of daily life, we have outsourced our dating requirements to the internet, and there is money to be made. One of the earliest proponents of the online dating zeitgeist was Match.com, a company that built up a reputation for serious dating rather than the later Tinders and Grindrs of the world, which tended towards quick and easy dating (and later became the gateway into millennial hookup culture).

App makers tap into what scientists call the ‘social reward response’ when we swipe through matches

Online investment platform XTB has ranked the top 10 dating apps by revenue per million users and it is by this measure that Match is by far still the most lucrative of them all, raking in $25m per million users, or an impressive $2.4bn per year, four times the revenue of its next competitor, Zoosk.

Another key rival, eHarmony, closes out the top three – all of them key players in the ‘serious dating’ market and known for their paid-for subscriptions that promise more matches and people looking for real relationships. The rest of the table is a mixed bag in terms of what you might call user commitment, including familiar names like Bumble, which was founded by ex-Tinder employee Whitney Wolfe Herd and touted as the ‘feminist’ dating app (in hetero matches, the woman makes the first move).

Apps more commonly thought of as hookup-heavy in the table include Tinder, Grindr, and Plenty of Fish. These apps are all free to download and the vast majority of users remain on free profiles. But even with non-paying users, advertising is a considerable revenue stream as with any other form of social media. Although at first glance the table appears to show separate dating brands, in reality half of the players on the list are ultimately owned by Match Group, which gives it an enormous share in the dating market today.

The ‘social reward’
Tinder’s crucial win was the swipe – bringing with it almost a gamification of dating. Later patenting the idea, the app asks users to ‘swipe right’ if they like the look of a profile, or ‘swipe left’ to reject it. Knowing what we know now about the tiny dopamine hits we get with every ‘like’ or comment on social media, combined with the drive we have for new content that keeps us scrolling, Tinder tapped into the addictiveness of infinite novelty with the irresistible carrot of potentially finding a match.

By reducing the matchmaking process into a series of simple swipes, a yes or a no, Tinder took away the seriousness and committed feel of online dating as it used to be, and made it light-hearted and low-stakes, easy to pick up and put down. With the flurry of dating apps came an increase in marketability. Hundreds of millions of us aren’t just using the apps as a product – we are the product.

Our attention is valuable and marketable, and advertisers know this and exploit the profitable elements of the free versions, while app makers tap into what scientists call the ‘social reward response’ when we swipe through matches, which keeps us coming back. Whether those using the apps are looking for ‘the one,’ or just anyone, our need for human connection is one of our deepest biological drivers.

Even though paid subscriptions are still in the minority compared to freebie users, with online dating here to stay, getting an ad in front of even a tiny proportion of that user base is still a match made in heaven for advertisers.

The route to a winning partnership

Businesses today are constantly faced with the challenge of keeping up with changing consumer needs. Many brands are turning to Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS)-enabled embedded finance solutions to gain a competitive edge, and it is revolutionising the way they develop relationships with their customers. A recent survey by Aion revealed that 41 percent of BaaS adopters are motivated by increased revenue when launching an embedded finance offering, alongside the ability to launch new products and business models.

With the promise of embedded finance accessible to any brand, choosing the right BaaS provider is critical. While many BaaS providers will offer cost-effective, API-based technology, providers that combine this with products based on the right banking licence and necessary regulatory and compliance expertise are able to offer a more comprehensive suite of solutions. Brands must do their due diligence to ensure their potential partner can deliver the products they need.

Spotlight on customer experience
The success of any business relies heavily on providing a seamless customer experience (CX). To improve CX through embedded finance, brands must have a deep understanding of their customers’ challenges and pain points in order to provide solutions that meet those needs. To that end, Aion’s study revealed that 28 percent of businesses wanted to see their BaaS provider showing a better understanding of their customer journey to create a truly frictionless experience. By offering a smooth customer journey, brands can reap various benefits such as generating new revenue streams, increasing customer basket size, and building stronger customer loyalty.

Brands must do their due diligence to ensure their potential partner can deliver the products they need

For Tricount, a pioneer in group expense management, adding the ability to let users reimburse expenses through in-app bank-to-bank transfers was the key to creating a smoother CX. Designed to make splitting expenses between family and friends easier, Tricount leveraged BaaS to remove the final layer of friction in the reimbursement process. According to co-founder Guillebert de Dorlodot, “Repayments with direct bank transfers were a long-awaited feature for our Belgian users, and we believe this is one of the first PSD2 integrations that truly makes sense for consumers.”

What business expect from BaaS
Research highlights that brands value swift implementation and a quick time to market from their BaaS provider, with 34 percent stating they would like to see these traits in BaaS providers. While speed is essential, for many BaaS adopters, the price still has to be right. Access to cost-effective services was a key concern for a further 31 percent of respondents, who stated they would like to see their provider moving towards more cost-effective services, while 20 percent of businesses not using BaaS cited cost as a key barrier to implementation. When surveyed about their other considerations when picking a BaaS partner, businesses named compliance and security as well as a lack of understanding about the products at their disposal as their main concerns.

The role of banking licences
The type of licence held by the BaaS provider determines the banking products they can offer. For instance, those with an Electronic Money Institution (EMI) licence can facilitate payment services, transferring funds, settling purchases and issuing electronic money. Alternatively, a full European Central Bank (ECB) banking licence allows BaaS providers to offer a more comprehensive range of financial products, such as holding of deposits and lending. 28 percent of BaaS adopters would like to see their BaaS provider offer products based on a full banking licence, and more than half, 58 percent, of respondents believe that BaaS providers with access to a full range of banking products based on a banking licence alongside their tech offering would be the ones to shape the BaaS market in years to come.

When looking at different BaaS providers, understanding their licence and how it can potentially impact the types of products they can offer is important before moving forward.

A challenging time for mergers

Regulators across the globe are increasingly adopting a tougher stance on merger enforcement in defence of national and international competition. Already, shifts in competition laws in the UK and Canada, and a re-application of current laws in the US and EU, are enabling regulators to address concerns about concentration in markets, entrenching of dominant positions and removal of dynamic competition.

Meanwhile, many jurisdictions are expanding their investment and subsidies screening regimes. The remainder of the year will prove pivotal as both regulatory and legislative changes take effect, making it increasingly difficult to have a deal cleared. As the global picture for deal-making changes, there are a few key points corporates need to be aware of in the merger control process.

Increased scrutiny
According to the White & Case Global Antitrust Merger study, the European Commission (EC) is more likely to block a merger than ever before. In 2022, the EC issued two prohibition decisions, compared to none in 2021 or 2020. The EC also published a guidance paper encouraging national competition authorities to refer certain transactions for review, even if they fall below the standard thresholds.

In the US, antitrust enforcers under the Biden administration are actively challenging more cases, attempting to block vertical transactions, and scrutinising acquisitions by private equity firms. In Australia, tougher merger control enforcement is manifesting in longer review periods.

In 2020–21, the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) extended the benchmark timelines from eight weeks to 12 weeks for phase one, and from 20 to 24 weeks for phase two. Similarly, there has been a hardening in the approach taken by the Competition Markets Authority (CMA) in the UK.

In 2022, the number of phase one cases referred for an in-depth phase two investigation, abandoned, or resolved with remedies, outnumbered those that were unconditionally cleared for the first time.

In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, the Saudi Arabian competition authority blocked its first deal on substantive grounds, and Morocco issued a $1.1m fine against Swiss and French companies for failing to notify an acquisition. Competition authorities across the MENA region are ready to scrutinise deals more closely, and parties should expect more merger control enforcement for the time being.

Regulatory divergence
Since the UK formally left the EU the risk of divergent views between the EC and the CMA has increased, exemplified by the recent Cargotec/Konecranes merger. While the EC cleared the transaction, the CMA blocked the merger, considering the same remedy package insufficient to address its concerns.

Likewise, the recently announced Booking/Etraveli merger was cleared by the CMA in phase one, but is currently being investigated by the EC in phase two. With this context, the divergence between the CMA and the EC will continue to be a risk that companies must manage, in addition to potentially divergent trans-Atlantic views. For example, in Cargotec/Konecranes, the US Department of Justice, like the CMA, considered the parties’ proposed remedy package to be insufficient even though the EC accepted it.

The European Commission is more likely to block a merger than ever before

A number of legislative changes and court judgments this year will affect merger review both substantively and procedurally. In the EU, the EC plans to expand the categories of cases that can be reviewed under the simplified EU merger control procedure. Meanwhile, elsewhere in Europe, the UK government has put forward proposals to reform various aspects of the merger control regime, and also impose certain obligations on ‘Big Tech’ in relation to deals they do.

The new Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Merger Guidelines are expected to be released in the US, forming a key framework for the US antitrust agencies when reviewing transactions. In Australia, the ACCC proposed changes to the substantial lessening of competition test which will encourage additional deal scrutiny. Finally, across the MENA region, a new merger control regime will come into force in Egypt and new competition laws are already being enacted in Jordan and Lebanon.

Countries across the globe are adopting aggressive and expansive stances towards merger enforcement, creating a challenging merger clearance environment for businesses internationally. The EU’s Foreign Subsidies Regulation will also add another layer of complexity to M&A deals this year, and businesses can expect a lengthy transition period to adapt to the requirements of the regulation.

Undoubtedly, the merger control landscape is becoming progressively more complex. However, with increased planning of the merger control and wider regulatory processes, businesses can avoid potential surprises along their path.